Search for: "Frye v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 6:17 pm
The United States Supreme Court today ruled that criminal defendants have the constitutional right to effective representation when making the decision as to whether or not to accept a plea bargain. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:23 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:45 am
United States, not Pettus v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:53 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (DC 1923)—or the foundation rule set by the state Court of Appeals in Parker v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
Bower v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:35 am
United States, Daubert v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Frye, 10-444, and Lafler v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am
New York is, like Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Frye state (as in, Frye v United States, 293 F 1013) that permits “expert testimony based on scientific principles, procedures, or theories only after the principles, procedures, or theories have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:13 pm
Frye, defense counsel failed to communicate an offer which, if accepted, would have reduced the exposure for a driving offense; in Laffler v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am
With the Court set to hear arguments this week in two of the Term’s most anticipated cases – United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:21 am
And soon, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments on two different cases that involve bad plea deal advice. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Yang argued for the United States as amicus in support of Missouri. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:55 am
The United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on October 31 2011 in the case of Lafler v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Louis, Missouri): United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
The states and United States argue that, so long as the defendant has not been deprived a fair and reliable trial, there is no prejudice under Strickland. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:05 am
See Frye v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am
See Ralph Klier v. [read post]
