Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement"
Results 161 - 180
of 946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 8:36 am
In the case, Riverside Sheriffs' Association v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:22 am
” “Lawyers who retire from a firm can be considered for a board seat with a firm client, Goldstein said. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
She is also a member of the New York Stateand Local Retirement System. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:38 pm
C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 3:52 pm
The case—Harris v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 11:20 am
” That was the holding of the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the ongoing saga of Retired Employees Association of Orange County v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:22 am
Appellate Court Case Not Originating with Appeals Board People, The v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:32 am
Bannon in Matter of Cayne v 510 Park Avenue Corp., the court dismissed Cayne’s petition on the grounds that his “overly broad” demand for records was “supported only by speculation” of mismanagement by the co-op’s board. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:32 pm
The Feres Doctrine dates back to a 1950s case, Feres v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:32 am
Wayne County Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 4:00 pm
Marion County Election Board (07-21) and Indiana Democratic Party v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:21 am
In this decision, Duferco Farrell Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:00 am
This finding, said the ALJ, was supported not only by the plain language of that provision but by the fact that "when the parties intended to affect a benefit granted to current employees that continues into retirement, they specifically so state. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:42 pm
Garner v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
Texas In Texas Alliance for Retired Americans v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
App.5th 246, review granted, affirmed 5/30/11, Chinese Theatres LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Amelio retired from the Board in July 2013. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 9:51 am
But the Government bans him from doing so, because 28 years ago, Hatfield lied on some forms that he sent to the Railroad Retirement Board: a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:39 am
Section 36(b) also grants a private right of action to shareholders, who must show that the adviser’s compensation is "so disproportionately large that it bears no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and could not have been the product of arm’s length bargaining" (Jones v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:31 am
"With many thanks to a reader, here is Marion Superior Court Judge John Hanley's 15-page, June 30, 2008 opinion in the case of Board of School Comm. v. [read post]
