Search for: "Hinds v. Hinds" Results 161 - 180 of 207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 2:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Barnes- Hind/Hydrocurve, Inc., 796 F.2d 443, 459 (Fed. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the case of Wright v McCormack [2023] EWCA Civ 892. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am by INFORRM
Media Reform and the Spectre of Democracy’, Dan Hind; ‘Renewing the Public Interest’, Professor Natalie Fenton. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 5:54 am by INFORRM
The injunction has been welcomed by politicians including the local MP and the Education Secretary, Damian Hinds. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:45 am by Steve McConnell
Hind-sight and cherry-picking are simply not fair bases for assessing what a defendant should have known. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm by Mark Beese
Coulter, Vice President and Chair, Client Development and Growth Practice, Hildebrandt José Cunningham, Chief Marketing Officer, Crowell & Moring LLP Beth Cuzzone, Director of Business Development, Goulston & Storrs Patrick V. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am by INFORRM
The Schillings website has a post entitled “The Shockumentary”, by Hind Habib discussing the implications of the recent decision in Heythrop Zoological Gardens Ltd (t/a Amazing Animals) v Captive Animals Protection Society, The David Banks Media Law blog discusses the “seven deadly sins” of court reporting here. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am by Alfred Brophy
Perhaps the best-known application of this thesis involves the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]