Search for: "I4I V MICROSOFT"
Results 161 - 180
of 352
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 9:07 am
Within Crain's Detroit Business, a prediction that the Microsoft view might prevail in the i4i case:Rodger Young, partner at Southfield-based Young & Susser PC who represented Teleflex in the lawsuit, said the court seems likely to side with Microsoft this time, and an ill wind could blow toward some auto suppliers. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:43 am
Whether the Kavalam patent was considered by the examiner is important because it relates to the the pending Supreme Court case of Microsoft v. i4i. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:51 pm
The proposed agenda is as follows: Morning Session • Greetings, TC Update, and Overview (10:00 - 10:30 am EDT): Jackie Stone, George Elliott, and Remy Yucel, Directors, Technology Center 1600 • Microsoft v. i4i Ltd.: How potential changes in the evidentiary standard for an invalidity defense could affect patent prosecution and litigation (10:30 - 11:15 am): Garth M. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:43 am
JL: There are a number of important cases pending, but if I had to name one I think it is Microsoft v. i4i. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:14 am
(FDA Law Blog) (Patent Docs) Supreme Court hears oral argument in Microsoft v i4i / ???????? [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:47 pm
United States (No. 10-5400) Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm
Highlights this week included: Supreme Court hears oral argument in Microsoft v i4i (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Patents Post-Grant) (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) (Ars Technica) (Patent Law Practice Center) (Inventive Step) AG advises ECJ: ISPs can’t be ordered to block file-sharing: C-70/10 Scarlet Extended SA v Sabam, BEA Video, BEA Music, ISPA (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) CAFC (en banc): New rules for post injunction contempt… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:34 pm
Microsoft. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:58 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Microsoft v. i4i regarding the appropriate burden of proof for challenging issued patents. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:25 am
Monday’s argument in the patent infringement suit Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership is still in the news as well. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:21 pm
In the case of Microsoft v. i4i, some of Microsoft’s amici contended that the clear and convincing evidentiary standard has a “compelling effect on jurors” and that it is “tremendously difficult to persuade a jury to go against the decision of the Patent Office. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term: former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership, which parses the standard by which companies accused of infringement must prove that the patent is invalid, eliciting a flurry of day-after commentary. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Online wsj said this of oral arguments in the i4i/Microsoft case:But Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:09 am
Patent Community Awaits Crucial Decision Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Microsoft v. i4i . [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 pm
La Belle, Catholic University Columbus School of Law Professor La Belle attended the oral argument in Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership this morning and was kind enough to prepare this summary for Patently-O. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
i4i squeezed $290 million in damages for an obscure feature in Word 2007. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:51 pm
Today the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Microsoft v. i4i, where Microsoft argued that attempts to invalidate patents using prior art not considered by the USPTO should be judged by a "preponderance of the evidence" instead of the more demanding "clear and convincing" standard.The SCOTUS bench consisted of only 8 Justices, as Chief Justice Roberts recused himself from the case; Justice Scalia sat in on his behalf.First up was… [read post]
