Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO PRACTICE OF LAW"
Results 161 - 180
of 375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
The Majority’s Philosophical Defense of the CAAF’s Judicial Nature Justice Elena Kagan’s opinion defended the judicial nature of courts-martial and appellate processes by reciting a half-dozen examples where the military system is similar to a typical civilian criminal regimes in its most salient features (e.g., due process protections for the accused, an appellate review system, a stable body of governing case and statutory law, the res judicata effect… [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
The State government is not their government, and they are going to lose -- they are going to lose votes if they do not reenact the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
But for our clients, advocacy in this area of the law may be the most important thing we can do for them. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
This Newsletter also appears as a post on our website on our blog, The Environmental Law and Climate Change Law Blog. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
” He then took the next rhetorical step in asking: “If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment? [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
Not when it comes to BMW trade marks, says Frankfurt Regional Court | Hellwig and VMware go in peace (for now) | The Trade Mark Adventures of Zara: Fashion Markets Moving Fast | The first non-traditional trademark registrations have been granted in Mexico | Fordham 27 (Report 9): Biologics and Biosimilars | Fordham 27 (Report 8): Second Medical Use/Plausibility | China amends trade mark and unfair competition law to tackle trade mark squatting and enforcement issues | Fordham 27… [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
Alabama that such a sentence was barred by the 8th Amendment. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm
There's no clearly established law on prone restraint (and we're not making any). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Probably just as a result of being online, for some values of online from a pretty young age, I was interested in a lot of the puzzles of how you apply rules that we expect to govern our conduct in the physical space to this novel regime. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
The Government immediately appealed the ruling. [read post]
12 May 2021, 6:25 pm
But a lot of vendors in this industry, the industry of selling surveillance technologies to governments, sell not only to the US and other countries that respect the rule of law, but also to repressive governments that persecute their own people, where the definition of “criminal” might just mean being gay or criticizing the government. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
King challenged the admission of the evidence, claiming that the exigent circumstances rule did not apply because the police themselves created the emergency with their knock. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
” In practice, many of the gripe cases say they are following First Amendment precedents, only when they’re confronted by a subset of noncommercial speech—that which does not solicit the purchase of the speech itself. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
In re Zoloft Prod. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
NGN has agreed to pay Dr Harris “substantial damages” plus legal costs, a settlement that was “tantamount to an admission of liability” of hacking at The Sun dating from his days as an MP. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Don't Let Your E-Evidence Get Trashed
The National Law Journal
The admissibility of computer information is more complex than you might first think. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:41 am
Remember Rule 5 in § 1:1 of my Professional Responsibility in Criminal Defense Practice (3d ed. 2005): Say nothing or do nothing that would would be afraid to read about in the newspaper or in a transcript or hear in a courtroom someday. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
This Newsletter also appears as a post on our website on our blog, The Environmental Law and Climate Change Law Blog. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:25 am
You're not supposed to do that. [read post]
