Search for: "In Re: Application of Chevron"
Results 161 - 180
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2014, 2:20 pm
You should re-read the original post on Best Key to understand what is going on here. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Duell OK, now that you’re warmed up, no more softballs. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
“Urges friend of the court briefs that address the problem inherent in the adoption of Daubert and Daubert-like court rulings, the application of Daubert in regulatory proceedings, and when judges misinterpret scientific evidence in their implementation of the Daubert ruling. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:58 am
Or that the cases are not legally interesting, because, due to the real tensions in the statutory provisions at issue and the vagaries of Chevron review, they are that too. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
A fortiori, such First Amendment protection is even more clearly applicable to references to product names within an expressive work. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:28 am
See In Re Burkin, 1 N.Y.2d 570, 572 (1956) ("At common law, stockholders have the traditional inherent power to remove a director for cause which is known as 'amotion'.") [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:56 pm
Under the FDCA, a pharmaceutical company must specify the intended uses of a drug in its new drug application to the FDA. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
” They’re asking for the Ninth Circuit to reverse the District Court’s Order by finding that the TAA is facially unconstitutional or in the alternative to remand the matter to the District Court to allow the Conference the opportunity to amend its Complaint. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:17 am
Natural Res. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:52 pm
Bard officials even more suspect, the attorney for the Plaintiff added that in order to protect their supply of this plastic mesh material, (which is not produced for the purpose of and should not be used in “medical applications involving permanent implantation in the human body or permanent contact with internal body fluids or tissues” ) the Bard officials warned each other in e-mails not to allow the Chevron Philips executives to learn they were using the… [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:07 am
” Here’s some proof that there’s such a thing as work/life balance in Biglaw… which is only applicable if you’re a partner. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:53 pm
In an earlier post Grist for a re-make of "The Formula"? [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm
Further, the preliminary-injunction exception was not applicable to the law-of-the-case preclusion. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm
Further, the preliminary-injunction exception was not applicable to the law-of-the-case preclusion. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:49 am
The groups challenging the rules faced an uphill battle to overcome the one-two punch of controlling Supreme Court precedent and deference to administrative agency expertise under Chevron, and their eventual loss was presaged during oral arguments when Judge David D. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
., Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
In re Griffin Trading Co. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is In re Application of Chevron Corp. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:23 am
For example, in the direct purchaser component of In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL Docket No. 1869, Misc. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:40 am
The new regulation set out a menu of options for “substantial misrepresentation”: revoking the institution’s program participation, imposing limits on its participation, denying participation applications made on its behalf, or initiating a proceeding against it. [read post]
