Search for: "In re John S. (1978)" Results 161 - 180 of 347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 7:32 pm by Larry Catá Backer
    The second session was chaired by Professor Gu Mionkang, School of Law, CUHK, and included papers by the following scholars:Prof Jianfu Chen (School of Law, La Trobe University, Australia) That’s Capitalism, but are there any Chinese characteristics? [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Supp. 247 (1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987) In re TMI Litig., 927 F. [read post]
23 May 2013, 1:44 pm by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) KF8935 .W42 2011Family LawPrenuptial agreements : how to write a fair and lasting contract / Katherine E. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
The Intracoastal Waterway, constructed by the US Army Corps of Engineers in the 1930's, runs the length of the laguna and allows for navigation. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:15 am by Matthew David Brozik
(We’re just going to treat Ahern and his company as a single entity, since they are, as we say, united in interest; and we’ll just call them “Ahern. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Johns–Manville Corp., 539 A.2d 871 (1988), where the defendants were asbestos manufacturers headquartered in Pennsylvania and the plaintiff was a New Jersey resident injured, mostly, in New Jersey (but also a little in Pennsylvania). [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:24 am by Margaret Wood
So I turned to the Copyright Office’s website for information on finding records prior to 1978. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
And it is equitable to prefer arbitration to the law court, for the arbitrator keeps equity in view, whereas the judge looks only to the law, and the reason why arbitrators were appointed was that equity might prevail.andrdquo;andnbsp; - Domke on Aristotle, The Arbitratorand#39;s Manual, Securities Industry Conference Association, (SICA March 2001). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 6:43 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
            In 1978 in Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. v. [read post]