Search for: "MARRIAGE OF BAKER" Results 161 - 180 of 709
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from Counting to 5 (podcast) and from Kristin Waggoner at PoliZette, who asserts that “despite what some might say,” “other artists who share [the baker]’s religious beliefs about marriage will also benefit from the court’s decision. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 2:58 pm by Lyle Denniston
  First, there is the issue of whether a florist’s creation of a special arrangement is a form of artistic expression that is entitled to First Amendment protection, so a state civil rights law that compels the florist to provide that service is a form of coerced speech supporting same-sex marriage, when the florist opposes such marriages. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 2:30 pm by Associated Press
Supreme Court sided with a Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. ... [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 6:30 am by Dariely Rodriguez
” In March 2014, William Jack requested cakes with images and messages demeaning gay marriage from three different bakeries. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:36 am by Elizabeth Clark
” The majority opinion’s discussion of standard free speech and free exercise claims ends with the broad language that “any decision in favor of the baker would have to be sufficiently constrained, lest all purveyors of goods and services who object to gay marriages for moral and religious reasons in effect be allowed to put up signs saying ‘no goods or services will be sold if they will be used for gay marriages,’ something that would impose… [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Jeff Schmitt
”  The case involves a baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple because of religious objections to their marriage. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm by Tammy Binford
Supreme Court’s ruling in favor of a Colorado baker who cited religious reasons for his refusal to bake a cake celebrating a same-sex marriage provides clarity to that baker, but still leaves some uncertainty for other employers. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm by Tammy Binford
Supreme Court’s ruling in favor of a Colorado baker who cited religious reasons for his refusal to bake a cake celebrating a same-sex marriage provides clarity to that baker, but still leaves some uncertainty for other employers. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:48 pm by Douglas Laycock and Thomas Berg
While Masterpiece was pending in the state adjudication process, a William Jack went to three different bakers and asked for cakes with religious symbols and quotations hostile to same-sex marriage. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:47 am by InternationalLaw Blogger
Supreme Court ruled narrowly in favor of a baker who refused to create a wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex marriage (ostensibly because the baker did not receive an unbiased hearing in the tribunal below),... [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:47 am by InternationalLaw Blogger
Supreme Court ruled narrowly in favor of a baker who refused to create a wedding cake to celebrate a same-sex marriage (ostensibly because the baker did not receive an unbiased hearing in the tribunal below),... [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, a case involving a baker in Colorado who refused to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“Next time you run this process, skip the religious animus” is not the same as proclaiming a First Amendment right for the baker to turn down the wedding, though it may convey a significant message for the future in its own right. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
The logo for Masterpiece Cakeshop is an artist's paint palate with a paintbrush and baker's whisk. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
[O]n at least three other occasions [all brought by one William Jack,] the Civil Rights Division considered the refusal of bakers to create cakes with images that conveyed disapproval of same-sex marriage, along with religious text. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
” The court further recognized the danger of free speech and freedom of religion claims that the bakery advanced in this case, stating that: “any decision in favor of the baker would have to be sufficiently constrained, lest all purveyors of goods and services who object to gay marriages for moral and religious reasons in effect be allowed to put up signs say­ing ‘no goods or services will be sold if they will be used for gay marriages,’… [read post]