Search for: "MATTER OF SMITH v. Chambers"
Results 161 - 180
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
The arguments were, perhaps, most fully developed before the Shipman inquiry, when CNN sought permission from the Chair, Dame Janet Smith, to broadcast the proceedings. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
App. 2016); Smith v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:08 am
" Chambers v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
’ Graham Smith, writing on his Cyberleagle blog, provides a detailed run-down of the implications for internet publication. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Another example would be the understanding of the concept of jurisdiction which we finally resolved in Smith and Ellis (Smith & Ors v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41). [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:26 am
Smith JJ.A.This is a companion appeal to Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The following list of the situation in other European countries was provided by the European Court of Human Rights in its decision to reject the UK Government's appeal against the ECHR's judgment in the case of Hirst v the United Kingdom:Prisoners may vote in 16 countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (unless serving a sentence imposed by the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), Cyprus (though they must happen to be out of prison on the day of the elections)… [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
The defence may be more likely to succeed when commenting on true facts; for example, “I found John Smith’s speech on the role of women in society to be both sexist and chauvinistic”. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am
Juni v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Smith v ADVFN Plc [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB). [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
Appellate hearings or other matters that involve only the judge(s) and the legal representatives can be handled without enormous difficulties, once technical issues have been conquered. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
The focus is on CSR (1) as a subject of legal regulation within states, (2) as a matter of international law and compliance beyond the state, and (3) as a tool and methodology for privatizing regulation through the enterprise itself operating in global production chains. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
(3) The extent of the duty, or rather the reach of what is required to fulfil it, depends on the subject-matter… (4) …the judge must explain why he has reached his decision. [read post]
