Search for: "MERRELL" Results 161 - 180 of 601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2016, 12:44 pm by Beth Graham
., 511 U.S. 863, 868, 114 S.Ct. 1992, 1996 (1994) (quoting Richardson–Merrell, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:58 am by Brian Cordery
Even if he was wrong on that, after carefully considering the House of Lords case of Merrell Dow v Norton [1996] (which he noted to be consistent with the EBA in G1/92), Carr J found that there would have been no enabling disclosure. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), General Electric Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:09 am by Jetta Sandin and Jay Levine
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), nor did Tyson offer a rebuttal expert witness. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 5:49 am by Hardee Bass
Philip Morris was a client of Merrell Dow’s because Dow provided humectants to Philip Morris. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), was a Bendectin case − but widespread, teratogenicity allegations forced off the market what was then the only drug FDA approved for the treatment of morning sickness. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 5:00 am by Charles Sartain
 The “ball ” that the plaintiffs could not avoid  was causation, thanks to Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharm., 509 U.S. 579, 590 (1993), to find that expert witness opinion testimony is reliable before they consider it. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:29 pm by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), you must object to an expert, such as a doctor, when his testimony does not comply with Fla. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
The noise allegations in particular are supported by Sergeant Merrell’s audio recording where the helicopter is clearly heard hovering over Davis’ home. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
No serious observer or scholar of the law of evidence can deny that the lower federal courts have applied Daubert and its progeny, and the revised Federal Rule of Evidence 702, inconstantly and inconsistently, in their decisions to admit or exclude proffered expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]