Search for: "Matter of Fisher v Fisher" Results 161 - 180 of 829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Fisher is a professor of law at Stanford Law School and co-director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 The “continuous representation doctrine tolls the statute of limitations … where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim” (Zorn v Gilbert, 8 NY3d 933, 934 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]; see also Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 167-168 [2001J). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am by MOTP
Comment: While the new rule makes good sense as a matter of jurisprudential policy, it also happens to cut both ways (shortening or lengthening the limitations period depending on the nature of the claim and under what theory it is actionable). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am by Nathaniel Sobel
” The authoritative precedent in compelled decryption cases is the Supreme Court’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Schachtman
In the Lipitor MDL for diabetes litigation, Judge Gergel generally used sharp analyses to cut through the rancid fat of litigation claims, to get to the heart of the matter. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 8:55 am
If you are interest you can register here.On 14 February 2019, from 16:30 to 19:00 in Alicante, the European Communities Trade Mark Association will held the round table: “Does function matter more than form? [read post]