Search for: "Matter of Linn"
Results 161 - 180
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 9:13 pm
Judge Newman was joined by Judges Rader, Lourie and Linn in dissent. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:59 am
When reviewing the grant of a preliminary injunction, this court “views the matter in light of the burdens and presumptions that will inhere at trial. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:14 am
In Astrazeneca v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 10:26 am
§ 101 as covering nonstatutory subject matter. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
Apotex (CAFC 2009-1381, -1424) precedential Judge Linn penned a tidy synopsis of the byzantine route for launching a generic version of a patented drug. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:00 pm
However, when a second patent covers matter described in a prior patent, the second patent is still valid so long as the invention is patentably distinct from the invention claimed in the first patent. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:49 pm
Finally, on October 30, 2008, the en banc Federal Circuit issued a lengthy opinion comprised of a majority opinion (penned by Chief Judge Michel and joined by Judges Lourie, Schall, Bryson, Gajarsa, Linn, Dyk, Prost, and Moore), a concurring opinion (written by Judge Dyk and joined by Judge Moore), and three dissenting opinions (one each by Judges Newman, Mayer, and Rader). [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:35 am
With clients on every continent but Antarctica, he has what it takes to solve your IRS problems no matter where you live in the world. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:48 pm
Majority opinion penned by Judge Mayer, joined by Judge Linn. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:19 pm
Slip Op. at 28ConcurrenceJudge Linn concurred with the opinion, but wrote separately to warn parties of the dangers of general verdicts. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
A patent is invalid for obviousness "if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
Subject Matter, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:44 pm
” With regard to “detection,” Judge Linn’s opinion agreed with Enzo Biochem that the claims were “not indefinite for most of the same reasons” discussed with respect to “hybridization. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
The district court explained that the terms of the settlement agreement explicitly precluded Datamars from opposing the motion for reconsideration in any way, thus eliminating any adversity between the parties on all matters before the district court. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
Stoddard was substantively involved in patent matters related to the identification chip system. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:06 am
Linn (Eds.). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:21 am
Federal Circuit judges Linn and Rader recognize this problem in their dissents to Ariad. (...)In view of the widely held perception that LWD was bad for biotechnology, it might come as surprise to find that major biotechnology companies Amgen, Glaxo Smith Kline, and Abbott all filed amicus briefs in Araid supporting Lilly and retention of LWD. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:43 pm
Patents are not awarded for academic theories, no matter how groundbreaking or necessary to the later patentable inventions of others. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:54 am
Judge Linn, with Judge Rader joining, dissented-in-part and concurred-in-part: While the parties offer v [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:17 pm
Judge Linn Judge Linn also dissented. [read post]
