Search for: "Michael Rappaport"
Results 161 - 180
of 224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm
McAdams, and John Rappaport, suggests that police unionization may result in greater police misconduct. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 6:02 am
Arbitrator Michael Rapport said yes, and the District Court in Arizona has now confirmed that award. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 7:14 am
For example, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport have developed a thoughtful argument that when the Constitution's text and history are unclear, judges should invoke interpretive assumptions that existed at the time of ratification. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Michaels, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law; Joseph Postell, a professor at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; and Michael Rappaport, a law professor at the University of San Diego School of Law. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Like many other historians of the founding, Gienapp points out that there was little agreement about what kind of legal text the Constitution was, and so there was little agreement about which set of interpretative principles applied to it.In contrast to Gienapp, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport's theory of original methods originalism argues that [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:49 am
Susskind, at AmLawDaily (Nov. 10, 2008); Interview with Michael Rappaport of Lawyers Weekly (Feb. 1, 2008); Commentary: David Bilinsky’s comments at sLaw (July 30, 2009); Commentary by Michael Stern in The American Lawyer (July 23, 2009); Jordan Furlong, This Is Not the End of Lawyers … But This Is the End of the Traditional Legal Business Model, 12 News & Views on Civil Justice Reform 6 (Spring 2009);… [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:18 am
By Eric SegallJustice Clarence Thomas is six years away from being the longest service Justice in American history. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:53 am
Michael Rappaport provides a good summary of “The End of Lawyers”, if you aren’t prepared to read the whole book for tomorrow. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:00 pm
” Michael Greve [my GMU colleague]: The mea culpa—hedged with a supercilious “I may have started it but conservatism got out of hand” aside—fails to satisfy minimum standards of intellectual coherence and empirical evidence. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
At The Originalism Blog, Michael Rappaport analyzes the government’s cert. petition in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 6:59 pm
John Edwards: * Andy Rappaport, partner at venture firm August Capital * Joe Costello, chairman, Orb Networks and former CEO of Cadence Design Systems [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:30 am
Whatever his current views, McConnell's argument in this article does not rebut the evidence scholars have used to argue that color-blindness in all forms is not required by the 14th Amendment's original meaning.The other article General Meese relies on is one written by originalist scholar Michael Rappaport. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:01 am
In my view, like that of McGinnis and Rappaport, originalism can only be effectively defended on instrumental grounds. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport have argued that constitutional construction is unnecessary. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Rappaport, David Rosner, Allan H. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
” In an op-ed at the Wall Street Journal, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport criticize Justice Souter’s Harvard commencement address. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an essay to be published in a forthcoming book on classical liberalism, Michael Rappaport, a professor at the University of San Diego School of Law, asserted “that, with some institutional reforms, one could apply the separation of powers more strictly to administrative agencies to promote a more classical liberal administrative law. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
Michael Rappaport, a leading originalist legal academic, defends the notion of the color-blind constitution as consistent with 14th Amendment's original meaning. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 8:42 am
In the limiting case, best represented by the original methods originalism of John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport, there is little or no room for construction at all; everything can and should be done through fidelity to original public meaning.)People often confuse two very different positions about the role of original expected applications in the New Originalism.The first position says that because these materials are not binding on future generations, interpreters may and… [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
Recently Michael Rappaport has tried to make the case that the color-blind Constitution is required by the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment (but not the original meaning Fifth Amendment, ratified in 1791, which, of course, is the basis of the Court's decisions in cases like Bolling and Adarand). [read post]
