Search for: "National Prohibition Cases" Results 161 - 180 of 20,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2013, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
§§ 2709(c) and 3511(b)–the provisions that prohibit the recipients of “national security letters” from disclosing the fact that they received an NSL (or the contents thereof) and that provide recipients with a minimal opportunity to seek judicial review of NSLs, respectively–on First Amendment and separation of powers grounds. [read post]
  At oral argument, Justice Kagan had asked whether, if California can pass a law prohibiting the sale of pork raised in certain conditions, Texas could pass a law prohibiting the sale of goods manufactured by union labor. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 11:48 am by Susan L. Nardone
Whole Foods Markets received the proverbial ugly holiday sweater in the form of a December 24, 2015, 2-1 decision by the National Labor Relations Board that declared its policy prohibiting recording in the workplace unlawful. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:32 am by Mike Scarcella
The Justice Department said this week a federal judge in Washington should prohibit a lawyer in a Guantanamo Bay detainee case from downloading and copying WikiLeaks documents to minimize the risk of compromising national security interests. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:39 am by Betty Lupinacci
Hunting, fishing, mining/oil extraction or exploration can all be prohibited in a national park. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
Subsequently, comments are provided regarding (1) the ex officio assessment of unfairness of contractual terms under the UCTD and (2) the validity of clauses prohibiting assignment of passenger claims under the APRR, according to the case law of the ECJ and national courts. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:13 pm by Matthew Kahn
  This threat exists both in the case of individual acquisitions or uses of such technology or services, and when acquisitions or uses of such technologies are considered as a class. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:09 am by Ana Popovich
The post begins with a case in which two workers were disciplined (one was fired) for telling their employer, a transport company, that they were “too sick and tired to drive safely and felt they couldn’t operate commercial vehicles. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 10:29 am by Jordan Brunner
The case is currently before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers  of the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 4:05 pm by Associated Press
COLUMBUS, Ohio — A divided federal appeals court lifted the hold Tuesday on an Ohio law that prohibits doctors from performing abortions based on a fetal diagnosis of Down syndrome, a case considered nationally pivotal. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Joe Whitworth
A European court has ruled on a case involving how national authorities handle detection of Salmonella types in chicken meat that are not listed in EU regulation. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Violating the employer’s prohibition against its employees associating with an individual associated with criminal activityDillin v Waterfront Commn. of N.Y. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 4:52 am by New Jersey Employment Law Letter
  Basics of national origin discrimination Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, and religion. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 3:17 pm by andrew
Related CasesNational Security Letters (NSLs)In re: National Security Letter 2011 (11-2173)In re National Security Letter 2013 (13-80089)In re National Security Letter 2013 (13-1165) [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:01 pm
Bush signed into law the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (AWA), which amended §§101(a), 204(a)(1)(A) and 204(a)(1)(B)(I) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") to prohibit United States citizen or permanent resident petitioners convicted of a "specified offense against a minor" from filing a relative petition for any beneficiary. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:30 am by Fred Rocafort
But it is very hard to see how a blanket prohibition on acquiring residential properties advances national security objectives. [read post]