Search for: "Ohio v. United States Department of Education" Results 161 - 180 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
NYC Board of Education 5th Cir.o 5th Circuit doesn't buy salesman's argumentTaylor v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Connecticut benefits from a strong manufacturing base and an educated workforce. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 3:30 pm by Schachtman
The United States Supreme Court has also encouraged hostility to party-funded research and writing. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 9:32 am by Mike Delikat
Ohio 2010) (denying summary judgment where supervisors told plaintiff that he would not have been denied promotion if he had not been gone so long on military duty); see also Erickson v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
However, it limited the scope of the injunction to foreign nationals with a bona fide relationship to a person or entity in the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
The epidemiology of raw milk-associated foodborne disease outbreaks reported in the United States, 1973 through 1992. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
"[2]  The term "bona fide wellness program" has been repeatedly used in published rules and regulations to refer to programs that will pass muster under the HIPAA exception.[3] In 2001, the Department of Labor, joined by the Treasury and HHS, issued proposed regulations hoping to define "bona fide wellness programs. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In 1876, lawyer and legal publisher Carl Jahn published the first issue of the Weekly Cincinnati Law Bulletin, a precursor of the Ohio State Bar Journal, and solicited Ohio lawyers to submit “law points of general interest. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
It posits the question "What if instead of ‘Bong Hits 4 Jesus,' the banner had said ‘Bong Stinks 4 Jesus,'" reporting on the oral arguments in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]