Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 922
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:42 am
United Parcel Service, a highly anticipated decision that supports pregnancy discrimination guidance the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued last summer. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The Secretary downplayed the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:17 am
Supreme Court handed a defeat to United Parcel Service (UPS) this week. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
As Ben says, there is a lot to talk about with respect to al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 9:30 pm
Gorewitz and 'Change of Neighborhood' in the NAACP’s Restrictive Covenant Cases, which is forthcoming in the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 55 (2020):Racially restrictive covenants flourished throughout the United States in the early twentieth century. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:14 pm
United Parcel Service serves as a reminder to companies that original documents can and often do play a critical role in employment litigation matters. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
United States, 167 U. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (which covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia), held "in order for a fact finding body to ignore a regulation in calculating 'just compensation' for a given piece of property, the landowner must show that the primary purpose of the regulation was to depress the property value of land or that the ordinance was enacted with the… [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:02 pm
In Young v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
In her recent concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:36 pm
Because the United State Supreme Court just issued its decision in Koontz v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2004, 2:55 pm
However, for those that are not, and wish an easy reading recent case from the First Circuit that will give you some idea of how it operates post-CAFRA (Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000), I refer you to today's opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 9:24 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 10:00 am
” This observation, one of my favorites in the widely taught United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:42 am
United States, 572 U.S. ___ (2014), the valuation of rail corridors may become increasingly necessary. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
United States, No. 2008-5085 slip op. at 8 (Mar. 25, 2009). [read post]
