Search for: "People v. James (1990)" Results 161 - 180 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Something of greater urgency had bumped the survivors of a massacre within the last few weeks of as many as 2,000 people from the first half of the show. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
 The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 12:33 pm by Cindy Cohn
FBI Director James Comey gave a speech yesterday reiterating the FBI's nearly twenty-year-old talking points about why it wants to reduce the security in your devices, rather than help you increase it. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Dugger (1987) was written by, of all people, Justice Scalia. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am by Bill Otis
 In 2010, 14,772 people were murdered. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Our public policy, to follow the Constitution, must follow James Madison. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Arguably when judges use their position to solicit contributions they misuse the judicial office and may cause people to feel intimidated or coerced into donating.[118] Judges might take advantage of the prestige of their office to solicit money for an organization, and this may occur even in circumstances where such conduct cannot be described as involving intimidation.[119] The prestige of the judicial office is not intended to be used as a vehicle to advance economic, financial, social,… [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
It took nearly a half-hour for the authors of the majority and dissenting opinions to orally proclaim in the courtroom their differences, in the six-to-two ruling in Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]