Search for: "Rockwell v. Rockwell" Results 161 - 180 of 250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2011, 11:54 am by Rantanen
  Thus, because Old Rockwell sold modems prior to the transfer to New Rockwell, and because New Rockwell sold V.34 protocol-compliant modem chipsets prior to the divestiture to Conexant, the court concluded that the sublicensing conditions were satisfied. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:11 am
Payment of unreimbursed medical expenses permitted by the Internal Revenue Code via a “Health Reimbursement Arrangement Plan” held not the same as health insurance premiumsKathleen Rockwell et al v Broadalbin-Perth Central School District, Supreme Court, Fulton County, Judge Joseph M. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:28 pm
Canon and HP contend that Conexant was sublicensed by New Rockwell. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:15 pm
Rockwell Int'l Corp., 150 F.3d 1354, 1360 (Fed. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:49 am by Steve McConnell
It's certainly true that the old Norman Rockwell painting of the kindly GP making a house-call is purely quaint. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm by WIMS
Defendants, Dow Chemical Company (Dow) and Rockwell International Corporation (Rockwell), timely appealed the judgment, and the class members filed a timely cross-appeal. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 12:46 pm
Rockwell Int'l Corp., 150 F.3d 1354, 1360 (Fed. [read post]