Search for: "STANFORD v. STANFORD"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 2:53 pm
Hu was formerly the President of the Stanford Law Review, so I'm sure the justices were rightly confident that he'd do a great job.It probably also helps, just a little, that he's a former law clerk to Justice Liu. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:30 pm
Taamneh and a companion case, Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 7:21 am
Polar and Tropp v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
The abstract:The Supreme Court’s decision last Term in Castro-Huerta v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:55 am
Brett Parker (Stanford University - Department of Political Science) has posted Polarization in State Supreme Courts, 1980-2020 on SSRN. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Among the most authoritative sources cherry-picked by the AGs is a well-regarded Stanford Law Review article by Schanzenbach and Sitkoff.[6] As the Kentucky AG notes when citing this piece of scholarship, “ESG investing is an ‘umbrella term that refers to an investment strategy that emphasizes a firm’s governance structure or the environmental or social impacts of the firm’s products or practices. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:59 pm
Natera, Inc. and CareDx, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:08 am
by Dennis Crouch The recently filed petition for certiorari in CareDx and Stanford University v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: R v Penguin Books Ltd: When Lady Chatterley’s Lover was Put on Trial (The Collector). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 7:07 am
v=VaSTb5kNT4s 7. [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:30 am
Times Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 10:09 am
Yes, constitutional law has been used to oppress Native people, but at the same time, we want to bring to the fore how Native arguments led, for example, to seminal cases such as Worcester v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm
In our first column in this series, we discussed the recent free-speech dustup at Stanford Law School (SLS) and Dean Jenny Martinez’s letter to the SLS community announcing (among other things) that all SLS students would be attending a mandatory half-day education session on freedom of speech and related norms of the legal profession before the end of the academic year. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
New emails uncovered in the ongoing Missouri v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
At the close of business on Good Friday, federal judge Matthew Kacsmaryk released a ruling in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine vs. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases such as Ward v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:32 am
Even before the Supreme Court overturned its long-standing constitutional protection for abortion last year in Dobbs v. [read post]
