Search for: "STATE v LAMBERT"
Results 161 - 180
of 545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 7:44 am
Lambert , and Cash v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Stating a time limit in an unqualified manner does not necessarily remove all flexibility. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 5:39 pm
Lambert v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:41 pm
In view of Lambert’s holding that a complaint made to a supervisor does not suffice, the employee did not state a claim for unlawful retaliation under the FLSA, declared the court. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
As recited in the judgment, in 2010 Teva engaged in correspondence with Warner-Lambert stating that it intended to launch generic atorvastatin in November 2011 (after the expiry of the relevant SPC) but then "surreptitiously launched the product on a very large scale in June 2011, before expiry, and without any notice to the patentee." [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
Lambert is relisted again for Friday, BTW. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
The main claim at issue is a Swiss form claim, and although this is significant for the present case, much less turns on it than in the other saga ongoing at the moment of Warner Lambert v Actavis (latest instalment here). [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
Here, as the instant action is based upon a fraudulent scheme, the doctrine of res judicata would not bar plaintiffs from seeking to recover damages in this action (see Lambert v Sklar, 61 AD3d 939 [2d Dept. 2009]). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons'… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
According to the Complaint, Stuart and Lambert `were charged and convicted of Offenses against Computer Uses, Prohibition of Lewd Acts and Theft. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 7:45 am
See State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
Lambert: The case involves when the doctrine of equitable tolling should apply. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
See, also, Lambert v Board of Educ. of Middle Country Cent. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:07 pm
The Valentine’s week’s edition is now available: Leading off this week is the Third Circuit’s ruling in James Lambert v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In Hinebaugh v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
In the case of Braintree v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
Rejecting all four grounds, he confirmed that the Court of Appeal is bound by the majority judgment in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (the Supreme Court’s decision in the pregabalin case). [read post]
