Search for: "STATE v. ENGLAND"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,069
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
This was the case in R v Rogers [2014] EWCA Crim 1680, where there was no act of money laundering in England but it was sufficient that the underlying fraud generating the criminal property took place in England and there were English victims. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 7:51 am
In fact, the authors of this article are aware of only one such decision, in which they participated — Schaeffer v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:15 pm
The page in the brochure calls out that the data were also included in the New England Journal of Medicine. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am
If it meant only that it would be pointless to state it. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:41 am
A famous example occurred last year in ,Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
See Douez v Facebook, Inc [2017] 1 SCR 751. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156 considered the constitutionality of the prohibition under Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 on bringing a kirpan into a school. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Marcel Pemsel analysed the General Court’s judgment in Apart v EUIPO - S. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Via the Florida State University History Department: information about the Dr. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 7:41 am
In PACCAR Inc & Ors v Competition Appeal Tribunal & Ors, four out of five justices ruled that such agreements fall within the statutory definition of damages-based agreements (DBAs). [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
" Stone told him that he was "a New Englander, ... a Jew, and you are not a Democrat. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
In Ensygnia v Shell, Miss Charlotte May KC (sitting as Deputy Judge in the High Court of England and Wales) considered how a post-grant amendment which added the phrase that certain embodiments "fell outside the scope of the claims", might affect claim interpretation. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am
The Court rejected the State Government’s arguments. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Last month, the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit held a reenactment of the argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Many officeholders in European monarchies bought their offices as part of a mutual bargain, and in return for their investment, their office was protected as property – especially in England. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
The current state of the CSDDD already represents a milestone. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:49 am
The case name is G.P. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
The United States proposed a broad product market including all shoes. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
