Search for: "State v. Amaral"
Results 161 - 180
of 640
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
Thus, the final reading for the course will be Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:39 pm
First, Amar said that WWH v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
By Eric SegallDuring the Supreme Court's oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
As a result, in the 1982 case Edgar v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
As a result, in the 1982 case Edgar v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:59 am
The majority opinion in Bush v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
The right of abortion is one of the most contentious political and legal issues in the United States today. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
One state, though, is not nine—and Delaware did not turn the proposal into law.The ninth state did, however. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
(We all remember how a tight timeline affected the quality of judicial work product in complicated election matters in Bush v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Amar emphasized the Marshall-Story distinction between cases and controversies as the basis for limits on Congress’s jurisdiction-stripping authority; I found the distinction helpful in exploring the scope of the Court’s original jurisdiction and state suability (Pfander, 82 Cal. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
In two earlier columns (the second of which is here) we discussed McConchie v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
The diverging approaches of the majority and the dissenters in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Joel Seligman reviews Akhil Reed Amar’s The Words That Made Us in the Los Angeles Review of Books. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
On Thursday, a Second Circuit panel declined to resolve this issue in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram David Amar have put forward an Intermediate View: the elected President is an "officer of the United States," but members of Congress are not. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
However, they, as well as Dean Amar and Professor Mazzone, acknowledge that there is no guarantee.Meanwhile, I'd like to raise a related point about state action. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In its 1989 decision in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]