Search for: "State v. Secret" Results 161 - 180 of 7,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2020, 5:15 am by Rebecca Tapscott
The CAFC first noted that ownership of a trade secret under state law does not require proof of patent ownership. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:22 am by Jim Singer
In Tewari De-Ox Systems Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:06 am
An interesting article from Thomon Reuters News & Insight on an age-old problem in trade secrets, the fact that bringing suit often requires disclosing the trade secrets.The article concerns a case in New York state court, MSCI v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
In the United States, since 2016, the Defend Trade Secrets Act has provided a federal cause of action for misappropriating trade secrets, in addition to state causes of action. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:34 am by Camilla Hrdy
For example, just a few years later, in Hall v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 12:42 am
The Uniform Trade Secrets Act, adopted (sometimes with changes) by most states, provides that trade secrets defendants can recover their attorneys' fees when claims of misappropriation are made in bad faith. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ltd., saying there was no court order for Philips to violate. link: http://www.law360.com/articles/719323/reed-smith-philips-shake-sanctions-bid-in-trade-secret-rowAlso of interestBut Philips argued that all of the information it used in its state court suit came from publicly available or permissible sources, calling the motion no more than an attempt to keep facts in the federal case from making it into the state case. [read post]