Search for: "Superior Lighting Group, Inc."
Results 161 - 180
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2013, 10:09 am
Looking further to Supreme Court precedent in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Croix Renaissance Group, L.L.L.P. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:00 am
Author Rebecca Shafer, JD, President of Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. is a national expert in the field of workers compensation. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 2:00 pm
At the moment, no one knows this better than Michael Dell, CEO of Dell Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Bell Sports, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:27 pm
Given this, parties to existing POD arrangements—PODs themselves, device manufacturers, as well as hospitals and ASCs with POD purchasing arrangements—should work with their health care regulatory counsel to assess or reassess risk under the anti-kickback statute in light of the OIG’s detailed commentary. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
(Magistrate Judge Perkin took case over and ruled in favor of applying Restatement (Third) in light of Third Circuit's more recent Order [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:42 am
HCR ManorCare, Inc. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 8:08 pm
The abiding issues are whether disability “trumped” all other work-related factors and whether the disabled had a superior place among protected groups. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:01 am
State Farm, based in Bloomington, Illinois, and Los Angeles-based Farmers Group Inc., the third-largest home insurer in the U.S., also hired McKinsey as a consultant, court records show. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:38 am
The motion to authorize the class action was dismissed by the Superior Court in August 2010 due to a lack of common issues between the group members acquired rights, and the fact that the class action would involve workers in 6 different provinces. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:32 pm
Rogers Communications Inc. began. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:15 pm
On July 3, 2012, Orange County Superior Court Judge Nancy Wieben Stock issued a ruling dismissing a California “Shine the Light” consumer protection law case without leave to amend, making it the first “Shine the Light” case to come to a final decision in a trial court. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:50 pm
., three county medical groups, four surgery centers, more than 60 individual doctors, and one patient are suing insurer Aetna Inc. in Los Angeles Superior Court for threatening to deny benefits to policyholders who go “outside the network” for treatment, even though their policies allow out-of-network treatment. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
The sum total of these Amendments would serve to maintain a private enforcement regime—necessary in light of governmental lethargy in this area—while simultaneously preventing the abuse that has allegedly occurred. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Page 4} Nacht & Lewis Architects, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:19 pm
Altria Group, Inc., --- N.W.2d ----, 2012 WL 1934726 (Minn.) [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
See Finderne Heights Condominium Association, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm
” Theatre Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:36 am
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
