Search for: "U. S. v. Frank"
Results 161 - 180
of 294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
To illustrate this point, he traces the CFTC's interpretation of the statute back to November 2010, just months after the passage of the Dodd–Frank Act. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:55 am
Frank v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:29 pm
S. 225, 230 (1964); see also Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
The court adopted GE Energy’s argument that Dodd-Frank did not protect employees against retaliation in response to internal reporting, stating that “[u]nder Dodd-Frank’s plain language and structure, there is only one category of whistleblowers: individuals who provide information relating to a securities law violation to the SEC. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm
The court adopted GE Energy’s argument that Dodd-Frank did not protect employees against retaliation in response to internal reporting, stating that “[u]nder Dodd-Frank’s plain language and structure, there is only one category of whistleblowers: individuals who provide information relating to a securities law violation to the SEC. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 9:36 am
Russell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
FRANCISCO "FRANK" LOPEZ, Respondent. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:42 am
She could not be compelled to arbitrate her SOX claim because Dodd-Frank’s amendment to SOX rendered the Form U-4 agreement to arbitrate unenforceable as to that claim. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:28 pm
Supreme Court issued its ruling in the closely followed religious discrimination case, EEOC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:13 am
Alabama, 567 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
S. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
S. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
S. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:04 pm
Watkins/Proctor & Gamble Professor of Law, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Nicole Porter, The Sentencing Project Panel III: The Criminalization of Immigration Law Since the Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in INS v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
Y v Z (Publicity: Sch 1 Proceedings) [2014] EWHC 650 (Fam), [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported above at p 973) is a judgment on appeal before Bodey J with a rather different factual background, and where the use of material was constrained not by s 98 but by the duty of confidentiality that flows from the duty of full and frank disclosure in financial proceedings. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
U. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
Chapter 2Law and Justice: The cast of characters, institutions and Forms; From Justinian’s Institutes to Jury NullificationI. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:27 am
U., Kaïsis A., Karayiannis S., Karampatzós A., Katiphóris N., Kiraly M., Klamarís N., Kondíli I., Kotsíris L., Kourákis N., Kríspis I., Lagarde P., Lando O., Lipp V., Mantákou Á., Meeusen J., Meïdánis Kh., Moura Ramos R. [read post]
