Search for: "United States v. Jordan"
Results 161 - 180
of 903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2008, 3:26 pm
., United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:21 am
Last term, in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
John V. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:25 am
Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, the United State Supreme Court held that an unconsenting State, together with state agencies, as arms of the state, are immune from lawsuits brought in federal courts by her own citizens as well as by citizens of another State. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
” Waltersheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 3), 77 J. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:25 am
For the Symposium on Mary Anne Franks, The Cult of the Constitution (Stanford University Press, 2019).Mary Anne FranksOn July 25, 1974, Representative Barbara Jordan of Texas opened her argument for impeaching the President the of the United States by reflecting on the preamble to the Constitution. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 10:31 am
Quinta Jurecic uploaded a Court of Military Commission Review ruling, ordering pretrial hearings to resume in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:32 am
United States and whether Section 16(b) is void for vagueness. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 11:25 am
Facts: This case (Jordan v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 2:05 am
White v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
S., at 693; see United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am
Jordan, 415 U.S. 651,662-63 (1974), sovereign immunity “applies only to suitsby citizens against a State. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
United States Postal Service, the court held 6-3 that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:53 am
Afterwards, MB remained in Jordan while Appellant returned to the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am
United States compels a finding that Section 16(b) is unconstitutional. [read post]
