Search for: "Whitman v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2013, 3:54 am
In Stein v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:54 am
In Stein v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:54 am
In Stein v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
Most notably, however, the court stated that immediate Second Circuit guidance on the issue “will significantly affect the conduct of other lawsuits now pending in the district courts which have relied on other legal standards or the same legal standard, but have come out differently,” specifically citing the decision in Glatt v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm
Most notably, however, the court stated that immediate Second Circuit guidance on the issue “will significantly affect the conduct of other lawsuits now pending in the district courts which have relied on other legal standards or the same legal standard, but have come out differently,” specifically citing the decision in Glatt v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:10 am
The Court, in Barenboim v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 2:08 pm
That is the question addressed today in American Express Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 4:50 am
In Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 11:31 am
Starbucks and Winans v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:49 am
Co-authored by Rob Whitman and Adam Smiley Two court filings this week show that when one internship lawsuit goes down, another one quickly rises to take its place. [read post]
7 May 2013, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court held in Whitman v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 9:39 am
The Michigan Supreme Court apparently agreed with our concerns: Last week in a separate Whistleblower Protection claim,Whitman v City of Burton, it essentially rejected the reasoning relied upon in the Furhr decision in reversing (yet another) jury verdict in favor of a plaintiff's Whistleblower Protection Claim. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:15 am
The current case, Murithi v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:30 am
In Chapman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 5:44 am
The second case, Raniere v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
By 2010, former two-term governor Jerry Brown decided someone had to save this state, so he mounted a modestly-financed campaigned against the winner of the GOP primary, Meg Whitman, who carried so much GOP baggage into the general election that even spending $180 million (of mostly her own money) could not prevent her from being crushed by Brown. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
Whitman v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:53 am
Unfortunately, the state of the law is that to hold Chicago liable, plaintiff's must show it to be an accepted governmental practice under Monell v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 2:25 pm
In Whitman v. [read post]
