Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 20,068
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 5:33 am
However, the complaint failed to satisfy Rule 9(b). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 12:36 pm
The outcome:Jeffrey B. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 8:30 am
On the issue of whistleblower protection, it doesn’t and never has. [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:23 pm
Sec. 2252(b)(2). [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 2:04 am
For Step 2A, Prong 2, it does not matter if the recited treatment is well-understood, routine, and conventional, it still can support eligibility. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 10:10 pm
Applicant filed the application as an I-T-U, but when it filed its SOU, the Examining Attorney entered the "single work" refusal. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 8:44 am
Posted By: Robert B. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:28 am
By: Edward T. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Timing of communication also matters. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:39 pm
§ 2.7(B). [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
by Ryan B. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm
Marie-Bénédicte Dembour calls them ‘forgotten cases’. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:30 am
To illustrate their point, the SH&B lawyers discuss the Third Circuit’s opinion in Greenspan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 10:57 am
At oral arguments, the Judges went further to state that the failure to submit supplemental authority “is no small matter; its your duty to ensure to ensure to the best you can, that the court doesn’t go down blind alleys. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:54 pm
Apple's motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) is pending anyway, but the court could rule on it in the short term so as to conclude the part involving Qualcomm's offensive claims at the earliest opportunity, or it could await the outcome of the second trial (scheduled for mid July), where Apple's offensive counterclaims (i.e., Apple alleging that Qualcomm infringes some of its patents) will be put before another jury.Neither party favors Rule 54(b), but for… [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:18 pm
Dep’t of Energy, 99F.3d 387, 394-95 (Fed. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:37 pm
Rule 506(b) and State Notification. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 8:01 pm
Indeed.So here is some new thinking that is as likely to be ignored as anything that isn't both newly provoked and scrupulously aligned with the current structures and ideologies of the third draft LBI:1. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
Likewise, if a university announces that it is expressing disapproval of the military's Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell policy by excluding the military from on-campus recruiting, that announcement offers no basis for applying First Amendment scrutiny to this exclusion. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Differences b/t distinguishing as source and distinguishing from others’ marks. [read post]
