Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2009, 4:27 am
They said that rectifying the register u/s 111 was not a prerequisite and the Company Law Board itself had the powers to allow them to file the Petition. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Eikenberry Case A recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Eikenberry v Lamson, 2020 NY Slip Op 33992(U) [Kings County Nov. 30, 2020], is a fine springboard for exploring the application of these legal standards to business divorce litigation where (as is often the case) the injunction movant’s ownership status in the business is hotly contested. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
In a case on review from any court of the United States, as defined by 28 U. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The opinion never uses the words “third party” or “third-party doctrine. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:31 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The words "suddenly and without warning" refer only to Douglas's perception of events. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
”[2] In short, in connection with the company’s IPO, the board of the Company effectively agreed to delegate to Ken Moelis virtually all of the rights and powers traditionally reserved for a corporate board, leaving the board, in the court’s words, in an “advisory” status. [read post]