Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
The literal wording of this provision would appear to restrict automatic, mandatory disclosure to those facts and data that are specifically considered in forming the opinions contained in the prescribed report. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Here's what the court said: [U]pon our review of the record, in view of the conflicting testimony and documentation presented by the parties — reflecting two completely divergent explanations of the facts — resolution of the issue of standing depends, in large part, upon credibility determinations. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Therefore, Secretary Mayorkas’s pursuers have been obliged to allege that his actions in furtherance of president Biden’s immigration policy are not merely undesirable, but violate his oath of office to support and defend the Constitution by, in the words of the Heritage memo, “disregarding, defying, undermining, acting inconsistently with, and outright breaching the legal duties and responsibilities of his office. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
App. 2018) (an armed robber inadvertently left his phone in victim’s car, thereby abandoning it, citing Edwards v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Breytman v Schechter ;2011 NY Slip Op 50125(U) ;Decided on February 8, 2011 ;Supreme Court, Kings County ;Schack, J. is one of those cases which end with the Judge ordering that the plaintiff may not file any more papers except with the approval of the administrative judge. [read post]