Search for: "IN RE M W"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 4,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2015, 8:59 am
Bone/McKenna dispute is a conclusive argument against originalism, but agreeing w/him isn’t key—wants to convince people to take on the harm story on its own terms rather than just say cts aren’t doing what they’re supposed to do. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 9:44 am
I’ll certainly be corrected by the author and dissenters if I’m not. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:30 am
Rechtspolitisch wäre wünschenswert, dass kein Verwendungszweck von Hanfsamen zu einer Bestrafung führen würde. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:26 am
Para más información, puede visitar http://humanistaspr.org. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:56 pm
I'm less profane (but it's me, so I'm still NSFW if your W is easily offended, and if so, fuck 'em). [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
I’m not saying a hundred percent, but very often with technical statutes, that’s how it works. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
A: I’m sorry for your family’s suffering. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
But—at least when the endorsers aren’t savvy as the Kardashians—they’re often just like the other people in their social circles—they find some things intuitive and some things confusing; they’re neither robots nor children. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
I’m not clear on why that’s the troublesome outcome of the slippery slope.] [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:05 pm
But, whether you’re the President of the U.S. or your company, it is not enough to just announce a policy and do nothing. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:30 pm
Colon has also clerked for the Honorable Julio M. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm
William & Mary Student Intellectual Property Society SymposiumA Right to Register: A discussion of First Amendment Implications of the Trademark Registration Process Overview: Dean Laura Heymann, W&M Law: TMs reduce consumer search costs. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:54 am
So I’m going to proceed as if Mr. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 2:10 pm
I’m going to be sending it back to Congress. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:52 pm
W. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm
See In re Riverbed Tech., Inc. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:01 pm
What is Reactive Arthritis or Reiter’s Syndrome? [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
We’ve struggled w/ the relevance of consent. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
I’m also a fan of Rogers v. [read post]
