Search for: "MYERS v. MYERS"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 2,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 12:07 pm
Myers v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
Where an ad is literally false, the court has the power enjoin the use without reference to the impact of the ad on the buying public (McNeil-PCC v Bristol-Myers Squibb)(1991)). [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
(IP tango) Zyprexa (Olanzapine) - Netherlands: District Court of The Hague finds Olanzapine patent and SPC invalid: Ratiopharm v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:20 pm
But I've seen nothing about Liu's work on the truly important issue of our times, on which he was aligned unambiguously with the forces of truth and light:Time Warner v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:03 am
Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:05 am
off theory of capital structure is usually understood (see Myers 2003). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:50 am
"In Connick v Myers, 461 US 138, the US Supreme Court indicated that federal courts usually will not consider retaliation allegations based on an employee's claim of free speech where "only matters of a personal interest" to the employee, in contrast to "matters of public concern," are involved. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:45 am
(Patent Docs) Reyataz (Atazanavir): US: Patent infringement complaint filed following a Paragraph IV certification: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 12:43 pm
In Myers v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:59 am
Myers v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm
Let's check their mission parameters ...The complaint was written by lawyers at O'Melveny & Myers. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
Myers, 563 F.3d 527, 533 n.6 (D.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:17 am
The ruling is consistent the holdings in Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady, decided together and reported in 252 A.D.2d 82, motion for leave to appeal dismissed, 93 N.Y.2d 999. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:13 am
Myers (09-451): originally conference of February 19 Belleque v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
(IP Osgoode) Australia: University of Western Australia’s application to appeal FCAFC’s decision in University of Western Australia v Gray fails (IP Whiteboard) Colombia/EU/Peru: Tough IP health provisions in Europe’s Colombia/Peru trade deal (IP Watch) (IP tango) EU: Something more about Swiss type claims: G02/08 (SiNApSE) (SiNApSE) US: Pharmaceutical patent settlements – and what about patients? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
(IP Osgoode) Australia: University of Western Australia’s application to appeal FCAFC’s decision in University of Western Australia v Gray fails (IP Whiteboard) Colombia/EU/Peru: Tough IP health provisions in Europe’s Colombia/Peru trade deal (IP Watch) (IP tango) EU: Something more about Swiss type claims: G02/08 (SiNApSE) (SiNApSE) US: Pharmaceutical patent settlements – and what about patients? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:25 am
Supreme Court will almost certainly extend the scope of the Second Amendment right to bear arms to limit state and federal regulation of firearms, based on oral arguments today in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
The Court will hear argument today in Skilling v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
Attorney Sri Srinivasan of O’Melveny & Myers will argue on Skilling's behalf before the Court. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 6:24 am
Cir. 1992); Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
