Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 1801 - 1820 of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Timothy Tobin and James Denvil
The majority opinion noted the 2012 Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am by WIMS
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
This case is on appeal from the district court's resentencing of Joseph Story in light of United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
Funk    On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0265a.062008/07/22 Justin Parsons v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm by Amy Howe
Unite Here Local 355 and Unite Here Local 355 v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 10:06 am by Steve Vladeck
” The state’s arguments In response, Michigan pivoted to a different textual argument than that on which the Sixth Circuit relied, focusing on Section 1915(g)’s reference to “an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Bey argues that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
In response to Scott Dodson’s piece on Bowles v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 7:45 am by Orin Kerr
Circuit handed down an important computer search case Friday, United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm by Eric Alexander
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), was right on the Michigan statute where Desiano v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm by Eric Alexander
Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 385 F.3d 961 (6th Cir. 2004), was right on the Michigan statute where Desiano v. [read post]