Search for: "D. T. S. v. B. E. C."
Results 1821 - 1840
of 3,325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
What did the inspector general find, and what didn’t he find, with respect to political bias? [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:55 am
e. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
It also defines what a “secure locking device” means (as seen below in ss. 6(b)(i) and 5(1)(b)(iii)) in s. 1 as a device: (a) that can only be opened or released by the use of an electronic, magnetic or mechanical key or by setting the device in accordance with an alphabetical or numerical combination; and (b) that, when applied to a firearm, prevents the firearm from being discharged. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:22 pm
Bryan T. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:15 am
There are some, including at least one Member of Congress, that have started saying that the Supreme Court’s decision in Stanford v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
It also defines what a “secure locking device” means (as seen below in ss. 6(b)(i) and 5(1)(b)(iii)) in s. 1 as a device: (a) that can only be opened or released by the use of an electronic, magnetic or mechanical key or by setting the device in accordance with an alphabetical or numerical combination; and (b) that, when applied to a firearm, prevents the firearm from being discharged. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
T 10. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court finds HALLUX… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
§ 1 et seq., as held by this Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Sox, Michael C. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Supreme Court observed that the Automatic Orders are codified within DRL § 236(B)(2)(b). [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
R. 103(b) “The dismissal may be made on the application of any party or on the court’s own motion. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
§§ 907 b, 907 d (2004); Catherine Fisk & Erwin Chemerinsky, The Filibuster, 49 Stan. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am
“ Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 8:26 am
(c) Answer to Issue: No as to the 401(k) withdrawal; yes as to tax due on the husband’s income. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
The Case is C-46/10 Viking Gas A/S v Kosan Gas A/S, formerly BP Gas A/S, a reference for a preliminary ruling under from the Danish Højesteret [the IPKat interjects to add that, since the Danes are so good at speaking other languages, it is easy to forget that they speak Danish too: Højesteret is the Danish for 'Supreme Court' and is not, as Merpel mischievously tells people, a tasty dessert]. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
See Sidari v. [read post]
