Search for: "Miller, in the Matter of" Results 1821 - 1840 of 5,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2017, 6:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
This will be both a matter of warning students to stay away from them and attempts to shut them down. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:50 am by Eric B. Meyer
Thus, Defendant has failed to show that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiff’s failure to accommodate claim. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Per the Court: “The purpose of the exhaustion doctrine is to ensure public agencies are given the opportunity to decide matters within their expertise, respond to objections, and correct any errors before the courts intervene. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Per the Court: “The purpose of the exhaustion doctrine is to ensure public agencies are given the opportunity to decide matters within their expertise, respond to objections, and correct any errors before the courts intervene. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:02 am by Kent Scheidegger
This is different from a child being sentenced to life without parole for a juvenile offense, Miller, 132 S. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:00 am by William J. Antholis
I now direct the University of Virginia’s Miller Center, which specializes in the American presidency, political history, and public policy. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm by Margaret Wood
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by Scott Bomboy
In a high-profile case, former New York Times reporter Judith Miller spent about three months in jail in 2005 after she refused to reveal a source of a White House leak and was found in contempt by a federal judge. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
"The majority opinion holds as a matter of law that because "only a small portion of the debt" the Attorney Defendants collected via foreclosure was time-barred, their demand letters cannot violate the FDCPA. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 2:35 pm by Kevin Goldberg and Karyn K. Ablin
  Because, while the RMLC filed its action in Pennsylvania, GMR has reason to want the entire matter to be decided in the California case that it brought   Not only is California GMR’s home turf, but the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has proven friendly to the RMLC (and unfriendly to PROs) in the past, handing key rulings to the RMLC when it sued SESAC in a similar antitrust case that was eventually settled and recently has been… [read post]