Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 1841 - 1860 of 4,050
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2014, 9:06 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” USC notes that one of the earliest recorded white collar crimes concerned an importer who, after taking out a loan to acquire goods for sale, planned to fake a shipwreck and make off with the goods and money.Another such scheme was the genesis of the ruling of the Lord Chief Justice, the 1st Earl of Mansfield [William Murray], in the Zone case [Gregson v Gilbert (1783) 3 Doug. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am by Vipul Kapoor, Olswang LLP
However, the justices did discuss it, with a notable point arising in that Lord Collins and Lord Sumption agreed that the contract, as well as the conveyance and the mortgage, were all part of the same transaction, whilst Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Reed disagreed that the contract was part of the indivisible transaction. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale, with Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed unanimously agreeing with her findings. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:15 am by Isobel Williams
In The Queen’s Jewels, Leslie Field describes the funeral cortège of King George V: the Maltese cross on top of the Imperial State Crown, placed on the coffin, fell to the pavement and was retrieved by a Grenadier Guard. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
The lead judgment was given by Lord Neuberger (with which Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge agreed). [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm by Jag
Lord Collins also ruled in favour of the appellant, noting that he was “struck by the chilling effect on the exercise of lawful rights such a deployment would have. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm by Jag
Lord Collins also ruled in favour of the appellant, noting that he was “struck by the chilling effect on the exercise of lawful rights such a deployment would have. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
He tried to get the court action against him postponed for a year, but Lord Doherty refused to grant the request.Mr McKenzie then faced a court action at the Edinburgh court. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 6:16 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
SSUK relied heavily on Sabaf SpA v Meneghetti SpA [2003] RPC 14 at [59], which states that the joint tortfeasor must have “made the tortious act his own”. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am by Alasdhair McDonald, Olswang LLP
Lord Toulson’s judgment Lord Toulson reached the same ultimate conclusion as the other Lords but agreed with the approach taken by the Court of Appeal that, given the defence itself is based on public policy, it is right that other public policy considerations should be taken into account (Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 47). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:51 pm by Schachtman
Lennox Lewis v Don King, [2004] EWCA Civ1329 (House of Lords, Supreme Court of Judicature). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Clarke would have allowed the appeal on the basis that justice requires that the Prince should be allowed to challenge the claim against him, and all parties would be protected because the Court would be able to resolve all the issues between the parties. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:51 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm by David Smith
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd [2014] UKSC 57 I will admit to being a bit cool on static caravan parks. [read post]