Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 14,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2016, 4:45 pm
The Court noted that under case law, citing multiple cases including Byars v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:23 pm
Breuder v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
On Wednesday 5th October, the Court handed down judgment in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and others [2022] UKSC 25. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am
These efforts have allowed President Barack Obama’s administration to deport approximately 2.5 million noncitizens during Obama’s eight years in office, more than any other president in American history. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2818 (Admin) (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, before Collins J), Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In 1947, the Supreme Court declared in SEC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:09 am
Last summer, the Supreme Court struck a blow to DOL’s “regulation by amicus” program in rejecting deference to the Department’s amicus curiae brief filed in Christopher v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
In 2007, the California Court of Appeal fired what I called at the time “a shot not heard” when it issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 12:52 pm
Q: The Supreme Court recently announced it will hear Fulton v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 10:31 am
Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs has applied the “substantial nexus test” established by the Supreme Court in Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:44 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) BX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 481 (04 May 2010) Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Civ 483 (04 May 2010) Al Rawi & Ors v Security Service & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 482 (04 May 2010) Home Office v Tariq [2010] EWCA Civ 462 (04 May 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Popa, R (on the application of) v District… [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:33 pm
Bureau of Land Management (Administrative Procedure Act)United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
LEXIS 114381 (WD WI, Aug. 28, 2015), a Wisconsin federal district court dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies a Native American inmate's request to have religious feasts at the conclusion religious ceremonies.In Bargo v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:31 am
., L.L.C. v Indus. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:10 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has denied rehearing en banc in Arthrex v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Clanton v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 5:03 am
For the complete announcement and instructions for applying, please click on the Job #1284 above.
Arizona Supreme Court
Administrative Offices of the Court
Human Resources Department
602.452.3311
jobs@courts.az.gov [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Citing Franz v Board of Educ. of Elwood Union Free Sch. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
No, said the court, noting that the Supreme Court has specifically rejected requiring an adversarial hearing with representation by counsel when making psychiatric medical determinations, even if they ultimately result in involuntary commitment , citing Washington v Harper, 494 US 210. [read post]
