Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am
Justice Juan Merchan read the first cohort of 96 potential jurors the names of people who they might see as witnesses or hear about as key players throughout the trial. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
Karlan, Race, Rights, and Remedies in Criminal Adjudication, 96 Mich. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:42 am
§541(a)(1). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
Cole[1], the Supreme Court of Canada provided much needed guidance on when an employee may reasonably expect data stored on his work issued computer will be treated as private. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:49 am
But Rogers faces these barriers: 1. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
~A does not necessarily imply ~B. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
Cole[1], the Supreme Court of Canada provided much needed guidance on when an employee may reasonably expect data stored on his work issued computer will be treated as private. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:30 pm
The headline of the Department’s January 20, 2012 news release published when Secretary Tom Vilsack announced his intent to propose a rule that would privatize poultry inspection stated: USDA Seeks to Modernize Poultry Inspection in the United States Inspection would focus on areas most critical to ensuring food safety, save taxpayers more than $90 million over three years and lower production costs by more than $256 million annually (1) Straight from the horse’s mouth. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
The case was the first time damages were assessed under the amendments to the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) which came into force on 1 July 2021. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
They contributed most of their money to defeat proposals and were almost always successful, winning 96 percent of the time. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:04 pm
Small 1 cm area is beginning to be open. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
This does not make the Chief Justice unique as a Supreme Court Justice—far from it. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:32 pm
The GCCF does not require that claimants prove BP is liable, only their individual damages. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:30 am
Here's what the court said: Nor, contrary to plaintiffs' contention, does the buyout of a deceased partner's interest implicate all of the factors that our courts have relied upon in denying discounts in the corporate minority or dissenting shareholder contexts (see Matter of Penepent Corp., 96 NY2d 186, 194 [2001]; Matter of Friedman v Beway Realty Corp., 87 NY2d 161, 167, 169-170 [1995]). [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:59 pm
The TRHCA required the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to expand the program to all fifty states by January 1, 2010. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Eisai’s Holman disputed claims that the drug does not work. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:46 pm
Failing to create a separate ceiling though would not provide any meaning into the provisions of the YCJA, which state, Policy for Canada with respect to young persons 3 (1) The following principles apply in this Act.. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:02 am
The case provided an opportunity for the Tribunal to articulate its approach to an alleged prevention (as opposed to a lessening) of competition and for the application of the efficiencies defence under section 96 of the Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:24 am
Every few weeks there seems to be another giant-sized decision in the Battle of the Buds -- and here's the next installment: Case C 96/09 P Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Bud? [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:32 am
Mouton was fined $2,000 for not registering but will only have to pay $200 if he does not violate state lobbying laws within the next two years. [read post]
