Search for: "Clarence T."
Results 1901 - 1920
of 3,444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2011, 5:59 am
Clarence Clemmons. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:12 pm
"We aren't spending money on unsolved murders and other crimes. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:55 am
NHTSA Rae Tyson said, “We don’t know what they have done and what they haven’t done. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am
For Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times), Howard Fischer reports that “[t]he U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 11:13 pm
It now turns out (and it didn't take that long) that the whole thing was -- how shall I say this? [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:04 am
Although the ruling is not likely to stand as one of the term’s more significant decisions, the opposite result—for which Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito argued in dissent—could have had sweeping ramifications. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:47 am
So the fact that the [defendant’s] lawyer knows what to look for isn’t enough. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:03 pm
David Savage estimated in 2007 that Justice Thomas spoke “roughly once per Term”: Only Justice Clarence Thomas is silent on the bench. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:30 pm
"We aren't spending money on unsolved murders and other crimes. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 10:12 pm
And that statement isn't even accurate! [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 7:15 am
But it wasn’t entirely clear what test the justices might adopt in its place. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am
Let's hope the Supreme Court doesn't buy into the hysteria. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:05 pm
And he certainly doesn’t mention the many barbs Justice Scalia has aimed in his direction in the written concurrence. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 8:50 pm
Judge Mizelle’s opinion drew from the dissent authored by Justice Clarence Thomas and referenced by Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh in their concurring opinion. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
” Briefly: In his column for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps responds to Jeffrey Toobin’s recent column on Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:29 pm
Clarence Thomas, apparently, didn't think matters rose to that level when it came to election-related cases. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:53 pm
Well, to be precise, I didn't read every word. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
But I have let this post stand nonetheless, because it also raises some points that David didn’t address. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
Then-federal judge Neil Gorsuch didn’t take part in that February 2017 decision after his nomination to the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:00 pm
The cases weren't a total loss. [read post]
