Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 1901 - 1920 of 15,559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 11:37 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
For all of the intrigue of (alleged) six-figure tanking bonuses, and clumsily-arranged meet-cutes on James Bond villain mega-yachts, Flores et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 1:35 pm by Giorgio Luceri
The full statistics, figures and report can be found here. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am by Eric Goldman
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 6:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Id. at 46 (comparing Tolman’s Figure 2 to a prior art “frac-iron” sys tem). [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
” There was no need to decide this issue because the court held “the government does not have a privacy or publicity interest in restricting speech critical of government officials or public figures in the trademark context—at least absent actual malice, which is not alleged here. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:16 am by Katherine Pompilio
  The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of the U.S. government in FBI v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am by Eric Segall
By Eric SegallProfessor Adrian Vermeule of Harvard Law School is somewhat of a polarizing figure whose opposition to gay rights and same-sex marriage are, to this writer, unpersuasive and troubling. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:19 am
Tam, the Board struck down the "disparagement" provision and in Ianco v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
PROTECTION DE LA JEUNESSE — divers — Loi concernant les enfants, les jeunes et les familles des Premières Nations, des Inuits et des Métis — constitutionnalité — autochtone — caractère véritable — compétence fédérale — droits ancestraux — protection — pouvoir de réglementation — souveraineté — théorie du double aspect —… [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by Katherine Pompilio
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]