Search for: "General Products Corp" Results 1901 - 1920 of 6,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2020, 2:41 am by Sander van Rijnswou
They thus cannot be compared to general model names for products like cars, for which the customer subsequently chooses the exact specification, e.g. a particular engine or gear box. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
Global Global – General Corporate business leaders: Want to create value from your IP? [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:11 pm
Stryker Corp., 630 F.3d 546, 552 (7th Cir. 2010), the result isn’t completely shocking. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Air Liquide America Corp., Cuyahoga Cty. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 5:45 pm by Phillip V. Marano
The term "Shredded Wheat" had degraded beyond being merely descriptive and had become generic. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:59 pm by Bona Law PC
See William B Howell, 57 T.C. 546, 557 (1972); Real Estate Corp., 35 T.C. 610 (1961). [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 9:56 am by Erik Weibust
Even assuming that employees generally knew the names of all of the “friends” on [the former employer’s] MySpace pages, it is highly unlikely, if not impossible, that employees knew the contact information and preferences of all those on the “friends” list from general experience. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:05 am by Doug Cornelius
Sources: 11 Securities Act Rules CDIs (256.23 – 256.33) Securities Act Forms CDI (130.15) General Solicitation & Reg D: Corp Fin Issues 12 New CDIs (& a No-Action Letter) in Corporate Counsel .net   [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:14 pm by Susan L. Nardone
Quaker State Oil Refining Corp., when it wrote in the context of an adverse inference instruction: “[w]hen the contents of a document are relevant to an issue in a case, the trier of fact generally may receive the fact of the document’s nonproduction or destruction as evidence that the party that has prevented production did so out of the well-founded fear that the contents would harm him. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:49 am
” I’m sure Xerox Corp., The Coca-Cola Co., Kimberly Clarke Corp., and Bluetooth SIG, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:12 pm
Simply stated, Travelers Insurance Company, who provided general liability coverage and other insurance between 1947 and 1976 to Johns Manville Corp, is no longer required to pay nearly $500 million towards asbestos settlements; specifically, the claims that center on the asbestos products manufactured by now-bankrupt Johns Manville Corp., one of the largest manufacturers of asbestos products in U.S. history. [read post]