Search for: "STATE v. SUEING" Results 1901 - 1920 of 13,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 6:17 pm by justia.admin
The Supreme Court would never require a litigant to sue in state court in order to ripen a claim alleging that local or state actors had violated the Equal Protection Clause or the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
Hansing, et al., 09-686). ** Whether a state-created corporation, set up to perform some public duties, shares in the state’s immunity to private damage lawsuits (International Shipping Agency v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:42 am by Amy Howe
California’s attorney general and local-government lawyers can sue facilities that don’t comply with the law; the penalty is a $500 fine for the first offense and $1000 for any later violations. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 7:03 am by Eric Goldman
Universal * YouTube Uploader Can’t Sue Sender of Mistaken Takedown Notice–Cabell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 3:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
Part of the law designed to assure a court test of the state’s new tax gave the state permission to sue out-of-state retailers who failed to collect and pay. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"Whether the states had standing to bring this case was addressed in the following:The [federal] Government argues that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the States have no standing to sue. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Rose, the issue is whether customers of a national bank may sue in state court to enforce the banks’ legal duties under the federal Truth in Savings Act, even though Congress has taken away their right to sue in federal court. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 11:59 am
It can simply wait and see if a client who signs the agreement sues it in California and argues the forum selection clause impinges on the client’s right to a jury trial. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Russo, a challenge to a Louisiana law regulating abortion in which the state contends that abortion providers do not have a legal right to sue on behalf of their patients. [read post]