Search for: "B. R." Results 1921 - 1940 of 55,754
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Le 18 février 2016, le demandeur a déposé un courrier dans lequel il déclarait retirer son recours à condition que le retrait soit reçu à temps pour bénéficier d'un remboursement de 50% de la taxe de recours (règle 103 CBE). [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 2:41 am
Sørensen & Kristian Torp, The Second Look in European Union Competition Law: A Scandinavian Perspective César R. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:00 am by David Vasella
 Im Ergebnis indiziert die Marke "AUSSIE DUAL PERSONALITY" im Gesamteindruck eine Herkunftserwartung für die beanspruchten Waren bei einem erheblichen Teil der Verkehrskreise. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:03 am
Rule 9(b) requires relators to plead, with specificity, the "who, what, when, where, and how of the alleged fraud. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 11:48 am by Alain Leibman
The government objected, and the trial court precluded use of the defense check stubs because of a failure to comply with FRCP 16(b). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Today, CMS held its Open Door Forum related to the CMS A/B Rebilling Demonstration. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:57 am by tracey
A v B and another (Female parents: Role of biological father): [2012] EWCA Civ 285;  [2012] WLR (D)  80 “Where a child was conceived by a mother and a father by virtue of an agreement between them that the child would live with and be brought up in the care of the mother and her female partner as the primary care givers of the child, there could be no general rule in family proceedings that the biological father was to be regarded only as a… [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:43 am by Jason C. Lynch
The government has reiterated in no uncertain terms its proposed standard for particularity under the FCA: “a qui tam complaint satisfie[s] Rule 9(b) if it contains detailed allegations supporting a plausible inference that false claims were submitted to the government, even if the complaint does... [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court recently changed the analysis for federal courts to use in deciding a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and in light of... [read post]