Search for: "Does 1-30"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 27,602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Other organizations, like Privacy International, also fear that the Court of Appeal’s judgment does not go far enough. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 6:35 pm
’800 patent col. 1 ll. 30–42 Cameron's arguments Cameron’s appeal presents three main arguments. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 6:15 am
Representative Evidence from Survey Experiments, IZA Discussion Paper, no. 10419 (Institute of Labor Economics, Dec. 2016) [text]"Does the Dark Triad Predict Prejudice? [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am
Source: Tax Foundation Alabama 39 20 30 48 15 12 Alaska 2 25 1 5 23 35 Arizona 27 17 19 47 5 13 Arkansas 46 40 40 44 26 34 California 49 31 49 43 14 17 Colorado 18 16 14 38 12 40 Connecticut 47 29 43 30 50 23 Delaware 11 50 41 2 9 3 Florida 4 6 1 22 11 2 Georgia 33 8 38 29 24 38 Hawaii 38 14 47 24 16 26 Idaho 21 26 23 26 4 48 Illinois 36 39 13 36 45 42 Indiana 10 18 15 12 2 11 Iowa 45 48 42 19 39 33 Kansas 28 34 21 31 20 15 Kentucky 23 27 17 14 35 47 Louisiana 44… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:35 pm
Milligan is the most important shadow docket entry since John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:40 pm
Two Options Available – When: Monday, March 30, 2020 , at 3PM CST and Wednesday, April 1, 2020 at 3pm CST Speakers: Reid Trautz, Senior Director, AILA Practice & Professionalism Center and Ruby Powers, with Powers Law Group, P.C. and AILA Author of Build and Manage Your Successful Immigration Law Practice (Without Losing Your Mind) Description: Our discussion (CLE for TX 1hr/Evidence of Attendance will be provided for other states as needed) will be an interactive… [read post]
13 May 2019, 8:27 am
§ 1446(b)(1) does not commence upon service of a complaint on an insurer’s “statutorily designated agent”; rather, it commences when an insurer receives a complaint. [read post]
13 May 2019, 8:27 am
§ 1446(b)(1) does not commence upon service of a complaint on an insurer’s “statutorily designated agent”; rather, it commences when an insurer receives a complaint. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
” The School District did not accept these releases and, “under threat of insubordination,” Educator submitted the forms with only the change of dates retained; June 30, 2013 rather than December 31, 2014. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:10 am
Paragraphs 30 and 39. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am
The fact that a trade mark might be – even primarily – understood as a promotional formula, does not mean that it cannot be perceived as an indication of origin (CJEU, Smart Technologies v OHIM, C-311/11 P, at para. 30). [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:41 pm
[1] The Ellis Act (Gov. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 4:37 pm
Third OVI in six years: In a third OVI, jail time can range from 30 days to 1 year. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:25 am
In a May 30, 2017 decision, Ledezma-Cosino v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:00 pm
RSVP: mcarlin@sdnyc.org Sunday, May, 18, 2008, 1-4pm, Community Free Democrats' Annual Lunch at Arte Cafe, 106 West 73rd Str., just west of Columbus Ave. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
Forever 21, Inc. (12/20/12) --- Cal.App.4th ---, petition for review filed 1/30/13 (Case No. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:19 pm
Details: FREE, but please register: https://www.law.berkeley.edu/research/bclt/bcltevents/2023-asiaip-aitool/ 1:00 – 4:30 PACIFIC TIME. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
If the starting date of employment is not until October 1, 2016 for instance, then the applicant will remain in H4 status until September 30, 2016, and may begin working as an H-1B nonimmigrant only on October 1, 2016. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
As the communication dated August 12, 2011, has not been signed and does not identify the entity of the EPO that is responsible for its content, it is not identifiable as a decision of the competent ED of the EPO.[2.3] Thus there is no pending appeal and the Board of appeal only has to decide on the request for reimbursement of the appeal fee.As far as the substantive examination of the application is concerned, it is the ED that remains competent.Reimbursement of the appeal fee[3.1] The… [read post]
