Search for: "People v. Harris"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
” As noted above, the Seventh Circuit in Judge v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
One particularly relevant case is Harris v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Barry Friedman’s The Will of the People is a smart recent take on this theme. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
Concluding the court wasn't ready to overturn Gregg v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
Appointed by President Harry Truman, she served on the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
Texas v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 5:32 am
Justice Harry A. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Judge Brinkema rightly rejected this argument, citing the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in McCreary County v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s announcement in New York Times v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:47 am
“From this day forward, I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death,” Justice Harry Blackmun famously declared in 1994. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22 Maclennan… [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Investors, the people with the most to lose, have had and will continue to have a limited voice in shaping the CAT’s operations, reach, and costs. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) makes its third trip to the Supreme Court today under the caption California v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:26 am
Affirming a state appellate court’s decision overturning the trial court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings to the trucking company, the state high court left it to the trial court to determine whether the company in fact misclassified its drivers (People ex rel Harris v Pan Anchor Transportation, Inc, July 28, 2014, Chin, M). [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 11:34 pm
Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun, who famously announced a similar reversal in his 1994 dissent from the Court's refusal to consider the relatively routine death penalty case of Callins v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
Today, I am told, the family members comprise 552 of a total membership of 8157, and the Assistant General Secretary, Harry Fletcher has responsibility for Publicity and Campaigning for the whole organisation. [read post]
