Search for: "Scott v State"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 5,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
O'Brien, United States Attorney; William J. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:51 am
He concludes that “the real effect of [United States v.] [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:40 pm
In a radio interview, Evangelical Michael Huckabee argued that the Kentucky civil clerk who refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple was as justified in defying an unjust court decision as people are justified in disregarding Dred Scott v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 10:00 am
On May 12, 2003, David Stillman filed a lawsuit against Scott St. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm
Scott, Judge. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm
§ 2518(5); Scott v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:52 am
Crane, Cato Regulation magazine] “Solicitor General Inveighs Against Antitrust-Law Revolution in SCOTUS ‘Apple v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:43 am
Baltimore (1833) and Dred Scott v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:00 pm
(See Elena Whitby v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 7:15 am
Jerry reveals: “The sexual harassment laws, of the United States at least, are purposely designed to protect employees and do not extend to independent contractors. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 3:43 pm
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:41 am
In Hoffa v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
Maatman, Jr. and Scott Rabe “Sometimes surrender is the best option. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:44 am
” At ACSblog, Brandon Garrett and Lee Kovarsky discuss Davila v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:20 am
In a majority opinion in Evenwel v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Region, 558 U.S. 67, 81 (2009) (quoting United States v. [read post]
