Search for: "V-lawyer" Results 1921 - 1940 of 74,064
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
He showed up to court and the judge asked him if he needed a lawyer. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:37 am by Brian Inkster
This was a point drawn out in some of the many comments and the, at times, heated debate that flowed from my blog post from last week: ChatGPT + Lawyers v Horizon + The Post Office In that post... [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 5:24 am by Mark S. Humphreys
 The opinion is from the Tyler Court of Appeals and styled, Stillwagoner v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Stanford Law School's profile of Jud Campbell, who recently joined its faculty (Stanford Lawyer). [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
  However, it will probably be some time before this bike will be delivering patent lawyers to the next season's IP events. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
The Ninth Circuit takes this baffling approach in part due to the 20-year-old Sex.com case (Kremen v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by beng
Last fall, Lexis+ AI was pro v ided to faculty and select students at leading law schools to test its applications in the law school environment . [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Heck, it can put an employment lawyer’s kids through college, no matter on which side of the “v” they practice. 😏 Last night, I read a news release from the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
FAIR (requiring law schools to allow military recruiters equal access to their campuses as a funding condition), Pruneyard (requiring a private owned shopping mall to allow political petitioning inside its property), and Zauderer (requiring disclosures in lawyer advertising). [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
C. 1.7] provides that a conflict of interest exists if there is a ‘significant risk that a lawyer’s ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the lawyer’s other responsibilities or interests.'” “The Supreme Judicial Court observed in Maling v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]