Search for: "ALLEN v. ALLEN" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 2:00 am by Stephanie Figueroa
Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme from getting their collectively lost $7 billion dollars, resulting in the SEC filing a lawsuit in federal court against the Securities Investment Protection Corp., otherwise known as SIPC, an agency with a reserve funded by Congress to compensate investors who lost money in failed brokerage firms. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am by Alasdhair McDonald, Olswang LLP
Lord Toulson’s judgment Lord Toulson reached the same ultimate conclusion as the other Lords but agreed with the approach taken by the Court of Appeal that, given the defence itself is based on public policy, it is right that other public policy considerations should be taken into account (Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 47). [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is well settled that “[a] cause of action for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed” (Elstein v Phillips Lytle, LLP, 108 AD3d 1073, 1073 [4th Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]), and that, “[w]hat is important [in determining the accrual date] is when the malpractice was committed, not when the client discovered it” (Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 95 [1982]; see Town of Amherst v Weiss, 120 AD3d 1550,… [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:19 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Allen, 344 U.S. 443 (1953) (Jackson, J., concurring). [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 10:30 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Administrative Law Judge decisions posted on the Internet by the New York City Office of Administrative Trials and HearingsVideo tape introduced as evidence of employee’s use of unauthorized force New York City Admin. for Children’s Services v Patterson, OATH Index No. 904/16A juvenile counselor, Allen Patterson, employed by the New York City Administration for Children’s Services was served with five disciplinary charges setting out 23 specifications of… [read post]
4 May 2021, 7:22 am by John Jascob
The petition argued that divergent interpretations of the court's decision in Dudenhoeffer have led to some circuits holding that ESOP fiduciaries are effectively immunized from certain duty-of-prudence claims based on the failure to disclose potentially harmful inside information (Allen v. [read post]
Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc., 368 F. 3d 371 (4th Cir. 2004) (“significant detrimental effect”); O’Neal v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Nickas, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, August 23, 2024 Tags: FTC, Ryan LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Nickas, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, August 23, 2024 Tags: FTC, Ryan LLC v. [read post]