Search for: "State v. So"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 117,815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2024, 7:46 am
The court rejected those arguments because it had already decided in Licavoli v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:42 am
King v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
The third focuses cognitive control of target populations of competitor or target states (and other collectives) connected to "cold war. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:47 am
State Farm participated in the appraisal but did so under a reservation of rights. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:38 am
The car owners in this case had argued that due process does give them a right to a prompt hearing under Mathews v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:04 am
They argued the court should follow a 2013 decision from Texas, Rachal v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:39 am
La Rosa v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
The question was simply whether the two probes could each form stable duplexes so as to get the benefit of two probes rather than one. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:04 am
It had eight depots spread throughout the State. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:01 pm
In the landmark case of Yick Wo v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:23 pm
Petrella v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
