Search for: "Actavis L" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Plus précisément, il s'agissait de savoir si une combinaison de principes actifs (en l'occurrence l'association valsartan - hydrochlorothiazide) était couverte par un CCP dont l'AMM de référence portait sur un des principes actifs (le valsartan). [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:34 pm by Patent Docs
Meuth, Associate General Counsel, Intellectual Property for Eisai Inc.; Kelly L. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
La société Actavis commercialise un médicament comprenant le valsartan en association avec de l'hydrochlorothiazide. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:03 am by David Lat
Actavis Inc., Gera Vaz, Jon Leibowitz, Lateral Hiring, Lateral Moves, Laterals, Linda C. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 3:13 am
L-336006-85, 1986 WL 637507 (N.J. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:41 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Nat'l Harrow Co. (1902), the Supreme Court held that product price fixing contained in a license agreement, which would ordinarily give rise to an antitrust violation, was lawful so long as it did no more than "keep up the monopoly granted by the patent. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Following Actavis vs Eli Lilly, is the UK becoming more author-centric? [read post]