Search for: "Actavis L" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Following Actavis vs Eli Lilly, is the UK becoming more author-centric? [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
PatentsIn a two-part report, the AmeriKat exfoliates the decision in L'Oreal v RN Ventures [2018] EWHC 173, in which Mr Justice Carr bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Part I and Part II)Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decisionWeekly Roundups: Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
 Katfriend Oliver Löffel (Löffel Abrar) analyses the legal perils of tweeting using the hashtag #Rio2016 and explores how the position varies in different territories.Compulsory collective management of copyright for images displayed by search engines: a French cultural exception to EU law Katfriend Olivia Klimis and Nicolas Lescot (De Gaulle Fleurance & Associés) take a look at new provisions in the French Intellectual Property Code (IPC) that… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
One of the great advantages of bifurcated patent litigation [perhaps the only advantage, wonders Merpel] is that bifurcated decisions make for shorter judgments and shorter blogposts to explain them. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:41 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Nat'l Harrow Co. (1902), the Supreme Court held that product price fixing contained in a license agreement, which would ordinarily give rise to an antitrust violation, was lawful so long as it did no more than "keep up the monopoly granted by the patent. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:09 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, including two years on the Enron Task Force, and received the Henry L. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:34 pm by Patent Docs
Meuth, Associate General Counsel, Intellectual Property for Eisai Inc.; Kelly L. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:03 am by David Lat
Actavis Inc., Gera Vaz, Jon Leibowitz, Lateral Hiring, Lateral Moves, Laterals, Linda C. [read post]